The Rosenstein Law Offices prides itself on obtaining the best possible results for its clients. The best possible results are sometimes achieved by negotiating a cash settlement during the claims process and/or litigation process, as opposed to bringing each claim/case to the jury for final resolution. Notwithstanding the same, we zealously prosecute and vigorously defend various type of legal actions while utilizing complex motion strategies in an effort to resolve matters as soon as possible for our clients. As examples, Mr. Rosenstein has been instrumental in obtaining the following approximate results (these examples do not constitute a promise, prediction or guarantee regarding the outcome of any other case):

                          RESULTS AND LEGAL VICTORIES

                                *** CLIENT TESTIMONIALS ***

$1,998,600.00 DOE Condominium Association vs. Major Insurance Company (During the insurance claims process, the insured was represented by attorneys. The attorneys were able to get the insurance company to pay the Homeowners Association for some of the damages during the claims process. Thereafter, the insurance company stated that certain damages were not covered under the policy and then delayed the arbitration of other remaining damages. A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit was filed and prosecuted against the insurance company).

$282,450.00 DOE Network T.V. Reporter vs. Major Insurance Company (The insured in this matter was a television personality who made damage claims to his insurance company for the reconstruction of his house. The insurance company paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to its insured during the claims process and then promised to pay for additional damages outside the scope of the declared coverages in the insurance policy. The insurance company then refused to make promised payments. A breach of contract and our own "novel theory" of bad faith lawsuit was filed and prosecuted against the insurance company).

$402,400.00 DOE Church in Long Beach vs. Major Church Insurance Company (A house of worship located in area approximately 100+ miles away from the epicenter claimed that it sustained damages as a result of the Northridge Earthquake. The insurance company inspected the property and determined that damages were either not caused by the Northridge Earthquake (too far from the epicenter) and/or that the damages were substantially below the high deductible in the policy. The insurance company filed a Declaratory Relief action against its insureds in the Federal Court and the lawyers from this office filed/argued/won a Motion to Dismiss that entire lawsuit. A breach of contract, bad faith & Unruh lawsuit was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court and prosecuted against the church's insurance company).

$226,100.00 Motorcycle Riders vs. VW Automobile Driver (A married couple was riding their motorcycle with protective gear in the westside of Los Angeles when an automobile unexpectedly pulled out of gas station. A collision occurred between the motorcycle and the automobile. The motorcycle riders were taken to the hospital via ambulance for observation and treatment. Thereafter, medical treatment was received by each of the riders for head, neck, back and wrist related injuries. A lawsuit was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court by the Los Angeles Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in this office. Ultimately, policy limits were tendered and property damages were paid. In addition, after extensive litigation, negotiation and argument, the ER hospital bills and related medical charges were paid in full.

$774,700.00 DOE Apartment Developer/Owner vs. Major Multi-Layered Insurance Companies (The buildings in an apartment complex sustained damages as a result of a natural occurrence. The owners/managers of the apartment buildings hired public adjusters during the claims process and those adjusters obtained some compensation from the insurance carriers during a two-year period. The multi-layered insurance carriers then argued that the insured's estimates for repair were too high and/or that certain alleged damages were not covered by the polices. The insurance carriers steadfastly took the position that they had fully paid for all covered damages. New detailed estimates were prepared by experts retained by this office. A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit was filed and prosecuted as a complex long cause matter against the multi-layered insurance companies).

$549,500.00 DOE Property Owner vs. Major Insurance Carrier (A homeowner claimed that the damages to the house were so bad that the house needed to be torn down and rebuilt. The insurance company disagreed with its insured and an expert. A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit was filed against the insurance carrier).

$502,100.00 DOE Sherman Oaks Property Owner vs. Major Insurance Carrier (Homeowners in Sherman Oaks area filed a claim for property damages and obtained payment. Thereafter, a supplemental claim was filed over one year after the closure of the insurance claim for damages. The insurance company denied the claim as untimely and stated that the damages claimed were not caused by the stated event. A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit was filed and prosecuted against the insurance carrier).

$261,300.00 DOE Homeowner vs. Major Insurance Carrier (A homeowner in Van Nuys filed a supplemental claim for earthquake damages over one year after the date of the actual event causing the damages. The insurance company denied the claim as being late and stated that the actual damages were substantially below the deductibles in the policy. A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit was filed and prosecuted against the insurance company)

$124,500.00 DOE Homeowner vs. Major Insurance Carrier (A homeowner in South Central Los Angeles filed a claim for damages to her home over one year after the damage causing event. The insurance company denied the claims as being untimely and stated that the damages were substantially below the deductibles in the policy. A breach of contract, bad faith & Unruh lawsuit was filed and prosecuted against the insurance company).

$173,200.00 DOE Owners in Rolling Hills Area vs. Insurance Carrier (Homeowners in the Rolling Hills area of Los Angeles filed a claim with their insurance carrier claiming that cracks in foundation were caused by the Northridge Earthquake. The insurance company denied the claim as being too far from the epicenter and stated that the damages were not covered since they were caused by soil conditions in the Rolling Hills area. A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit was filed and prosecuted against the insurance carrier).

$136,900.00   Big Rig Truck Driver vs. Nissan Auto Driver (An out-of-state big rig truck was hit by an automobile on a California freeway. The insurance company for the automobile driver disputed liability and the amount of the necessary treatment for the neck/back injuries sustained by the truck driver. A lawsuit was filed in the Riverside County Superior Court by a Los Angeles Truck Accident Lawyer or Los Angeles Big Rig Accident Lawyer against the driver of the automobile and the carrier for the automobile driver ultimately tendered policy limits. In addition, we obtained compensation from other sources to ensure that all medical bills were paid in full without offset).

$105,200.00   Mercedes Auto/Car Driver vs. Jeep SUV Driver (A local Southern California resident proceeded straight through an intersection controlled by stop signs and was sideswiped by an SUV. The insurance carrier for the SUV disputed the nature, extent and causes of the car driver's claimed injuries/damages. A lawsuit was filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court by a Los Angeles Car Accident Lawyer or Los Angeles Auto Accident Attorney against the driver of the SUV and the carrier for the SUV driver ultimately tendered policy limits. Thereafter, the med-pay carrier also tendered its policy limits for medical related expenses).

$55,100.00   Lexus Auto/Car Driver vs. Toyota Pick-Up Truck Driver (A local Woodland Hills, California resident made a left turn at a controlled intersection and collided with a small pick-up truck. The insurance company for the truck driver disputed liability and alleged that the left turn by the auto/car driver was made in violation of right-of-way laws. A lawsuit was filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court by a Los Angeles California Car Accident Lawyer or Los Angeles California Auto Accident Attorney against the driver of the truck and the carrier for the truck driver ultimately tendered policy limits. Thereafter, the underinsured motorist carrier argued against liability, but ultimately tendered policy limits plus non reimbursable med-pay after the Los Angeles Car Accident Lawyer or Los Angeles Auto Accident Attorney proceeded to file a first-party insurance bad faith lawsuit against the underinsured motorist carrier).

$30,000.00   Doe Injured Party vs. Large Adventure Amusement Park (An Iowa resident fell on the ground and hurt her leg while trying to swing on a tire swing at a large adventure style amusement park in the State of California. The injured party filed a claim against the amusement park for her injuries and she represented herself during the claims process. The self-insured amusement park which was owned by Disney, Disneyland or California Adventure alleged that they were not liable for the adventure amusement park accident and took a plausible position that the injured party was totally at fault for her own injuries. The adventure amusement park offered the injured party a total gross settlement of $2,500.00 as an alleged gesture of "goodwill assistance." Thereafter, the injured party hired the California Amusement Park Lawyers or the Anaheim Amusement Park Lawyers at this office to further prosecute the matter against the California Amusement Park).

$179,000.00   DOE Injured Party vs. ROE Well Known Attorney-at-Law (Court Judgement Obtained for Legal Malpractice, Breach of Contract & Fraud against Lawyer). An injured party hired a well known lawyer to represent her in a personal injury action. The other lawyer filed a lawsuit on behalf of the injured party but failed to prosecute the same. The court dismissed the underlying personal injury action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. A lawsuit was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the negligent lawyer and his firm for legal malpractice, breach of contract and fraud. This office obtained a Judgement in the Los Angeles Superior Court for the Injured Party against the negligent lawyer and his firm on all counts. The attorneys in this office were also instrumental in the disciplinary prosecution by the State Bar of California against the negligent attorney).

COURT JUDGEMENT FOR OUR CLIENT AS DEFENDANT FOLLOWED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION ACTION: Ford Motor Credit & Ford Leasing Company vs. LLP Partnership of California Lawyers (A partner/lawyer in a law firm hired this office to defend a $90,000.00-$125,000.00 breach of lease contract action that was brought by major lenders/leasing companies to obtain payment in connection with the build-out of a law firm and for years of future rent pursuant to an alleged office lease agreement. The lawyers at this office vigorously defended the case on several theories, filed multiple demurrers/motions to strike/requests to take judicial notice, argued the case on motions, and obtained a Court Judgement of Dismissal for one of the defendant lawyers/partners at the outset. After further motions by this office, the remainder of the case was later dismissed as against all parties with prejudice and without any payments being made by our clients. Once court judgement was obtained for the individual defendant lawyer/partner, a separate malicious prosecution action was prepared, filed, and successfully prosecuted against the major lenders and their lawyers for allegedly filing the initial actions against the individual lawyer without probable cause).

These examples do not constitute a promise, prediction or guarantee regarding the outcome of any other case, and the amounts cited above are close approximations. The examples cited above are only representative of approximate results which have been achieved in specific insurance cases, personal injury cases and legal malpractice matters. (e.g., Los Angeles California Car & Truck Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer, California Accident Attorney, Attorneys, Lawyer, Lawyers, California Accident Lawyer, Lawyers, Southern California Attorneys, Southern California Lawyers, Personal Injury Lawyer or Attorney in Los Angeles, Los Angeles Car Accident Lawyer, Attorney, Los Angeles Auto Accident Attorney, Los Angeles Truck Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles Big Rig Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles Motorcycle Accident Lawyer, Attorney, Los Angeles Dog Bite Lawyer, Attorney, Los Angeles Insurance Claim Lawyer, Attorney, San Bernardino, Valencia, Stevenson Ranch, San Diego, California Fire Claim or Claims Lawyer, Insurance Lawyer, Los Angeles Condominium Association Lawyer, Attorney, Los Angeles Earthquake Insurance Claim Lawyer, Los Angeles Insurance Bad Faith Lawyer, Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer, California Amusement Park Lawyer, Anaheim Amusement Park Lawyer, Studios Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles Car Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles Truck Accident Lawyer, Lawyers, Attorney, Attorneys, etc.) In addition, the names of the actual parties have been withheld to protect confidentiality. The facts, circumstances and results in each and every case are different.

Click to view Disclaimer

return to top

return to home

THE ROSENSTEIN LAW OFFICES © 2001-2007. All Rights Reserved. Los Angeles Car Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles California Truck Accident Lawyer, Los Angeles Earthquake & California Fire Insurance Claims Lawyer & California Insurance Bad Faith Lawyer - California Insurance Lawyer, Lawyers, Attorney, Attorneys